Thursday, 28 March 2013

Day 3/4


During day 3 we started to gather materials for testing out more of the art side of the project. We went out to buy various materials from simple pencils and paper to metallic paint, wire and modrock. We are hoping to experiment with creating several sculptures that could be inserted into spheres or merely be used to decorate the net from the outside.

Amongst some of our ideas is to create models of microbes. We are particularly interested in trying out diatoms and radiolarians. Radiolarians in particular have a very interesting honeycomb-like structure which we are also thinking we could connect with bees and create a sort of two in one sculpture.






Here are a few speed sketches of ideas of how I'd go about making a model. In the first one of the diatom structure, I'm considering putting a hollow tube through it so that a cord of some kind can be inserted and therefore it can be hung up, or suspended in a sphere. Putting the cord through the centre would evenly distribute the stress of its weight so it hopefully wouldn't break. I'm thinking of trying out the idea with a simple cardboard and paper base that’s then covered with modrock and metallic paint.

For the radiolarian I'm considering using a balloon that will afterward be popped to create the hollow interior, there could be several ways of creating the honeycomb structure, including papier macheing the whole structure and then cutting out holes, or overlying some string, hardening them with modrock and then popping the balloon. It would need some experimentation.

 Jessica with her wire radiolarian

 Making a papier mache beetle. This will be covered in modrock and then painted.


Jessica papier macheing a wire mesh

Here are some moss balls. When first added to the water they moved around quite a lot which looked very appealing and interesting. Unfortunatly they did at last come to a standstill. In a sphere perhaps some movement could be applied somehow to keep the balls moving. I think these would look great in an aquatic sphere.

Due to some technical difficulties a lot of the other photos of our work in progress can not be currently uploaded. As I'm going on a trip over Easter I will also be unable to update untill I get back and so the blog will be on hiatus for a week. Look forward to the next post, happy Easter everyone! : )

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

Day 2


 Meeting with Annette

To start off our day we first had a meeting with Annette who works with algae. We wanted to find a type that could be suitable for growing in spheres both aesthetically and practically and we were shown several different algal species of varying colours and consistences. 


Many different types of algae in tubes for us to select

A few possible contenders

This algae was strongly considered for its colour, however, it had a very clumpy nature which we thought be unsuitable for our work



These were our final selections for the algae. The red was the brightest and the most eye catching of the red and brown types that we could find. The lime and dark green we thought were definitely the best of the selection we were presented with in terms of their colour and the consistencies of all the species seemed to be smooth, nicely distributed and suitable for our purposes.

We also had a look at these ‘blue’ algae down in the cellar. Unfortunately it wasn't growing very well and the colour was poor so it wasn't that much of an option. We also saw an orange flask which contained algae that had been treated with pesticide (below). Unfortunately these were not only a nice colour, but also dead, so these would be completely unusable!


Pesticide treated algae

We also enquired about the possibility of using bio-luminescent algae which could give some fantastic night-time displays. Unfortunately though, the department didn't possess any of these species and we were informed that they were difficult to grow. Also, despite having lit up spheres sounding like a very nice idea, in reality the display would probably not be viewed in the dark that often.

Another option would be to use halobacteria. Once again the department was currently not in possession of any, also they grow in highly saline conditions which would be unsuitable for any companion species. However, the salt would produce some nice looking crystals for display and a nice pink colour. This could definitely be an idea for use in the future, perhaps when spheres are been maintained and replaced at a later date.

Our ideas for the algae involved making patterns inside the glass spheres. Agrose gel could be swirled around and then algae would be grown on this gel to make the pattern colourfully come alive. People could watch the algae grow over time and the spheres could potentially last for several months before needing to be maintained. During this maintenance period, the old sphere could be taken down and replaced immediately with a new, already prepared sphere of a differing design. The old sphere would then be cleaned out and prepared for future displays. We would use agrose opposed to agar because even though it is a little more expensive, it is also clearer and probably more suitable for an artistic piece.

We started our experiments of this today (or yesterday by the time this post gets published!). First we had six spherical flasks sterilized and we would be experimenting with swirling agar over them that afternoon. Agar is cheaper than agrose, so as these would only be experiments, we would use this material instead. The three algae that we chose would ideally grow in two different environments, however, the darker green one is apparently quite resilient and would grow on the media of the other two selected species. The algae is rather slow growing and we’ll have to wait quite some time to see results. Hopefully we’ll be taking pictures of their growth process.

Our meeting with Annette also gave us some important information regarding the technicalities of the spheres themselves. The spheres used for the final artwork need to be autoclaved for the algae to grow in them. This process involves heating the material to 121°C and a pressure of 1 bar for 20 minutes, for the purpose of sterilization. There is also a question hanging over how the spheres will be internally accessed. After this meeting I sent an email to the company who we will probably order the test spheres from, to ask both these questions and also ask about the prices for small 25cm diameter spheres for tests and also the possibility of obtaining free samples. If the spheres themselves can not be autoclaved, another possibility is to put the small spherical flasks inside the sphere to create a sort of bunch of grapes type image.
Potential problems with this experiment is that the algae may dry out and if the container was sealed, the algae may not have enough air before they need to be changed. However, having access to the outside may cause problems with fungi and bacteria but a filter could possibly be used.

We will be testing out the spherical glasses this afternoon so read on to see how we did! 

Meeting with Stewart Casson




Our next task of the day was to meet with Stewart Casson to find out about the possibility of growing a plant called selaginella in the spheres. We went down into the basement of the department to take photos of some of the plant which had already been grown in sealed containers for over a year with no maintenance at all. This evidently could be a very interesting possibility of something that could work for us.

 Plants kept in the basement

When looking at the plants, although alive, many of them looked ill, droopy and not very artistic. Condensation had collected on the inside of the containers as well, which detracted from the appearance, although we speculated that inside a sphere the water would probably be more likely to drip down to the bottom. Further problems included that parts of the plants would naturally die back in any case and some of the tests had become covered in algae. The spheres would be a lot bigger than the tiny containers we saw, however, the amount of selaginella inside it would also need to be proportionally bigger to work as an artistic piece. Although very interesting, this idea doesn’t seem too plausible for a work of art. 



Top-right was more a less dead; bottom-right was infected with algae. The other two were yellowing in places and there was a lot of condensation inside the containers.

The Day's Research

This is a hall from Belgium where the ceiling is decorated with beautifully iridescent beetle shells.

Initially our research for purchasing some materials online didn’t go brilliantly. We wanted to obtain some iridescent beetle shells, however it proved very difficult to find suppliers just for the shells. However, we did eventually find this website http://www.insect-sale.com/ which stocked the whole (dead) insects. We looked through the list and picked out several possible that were reasonably priced.


A possible alternative to using beetle shells, as well as an idea in its own right, would be to use iridescent seashells.


Left, a possible contender for usable beetles.

Other research included having a look at the possibility of growing fungi in the spheres. This website http://www.fungiphoto.com/  had some wonderful pictures, (a few inserted below) and definitley made us think of the possibility of obtaining some fungi growing kits.

We finished our research by sending of emails to various members of staff to arrange more meetings.


Testing with Annette at 3pm


The six spherical flasks that we had left with Annette earlier had all been autoclaved, along with bottles, pipettes and six lots of agar jelly (2x 1.4% 1.2% and 1%) that we would be using. Before we could use the agar jelly medium, two other components also needed to be added to it. These components didn’t work well if they were autoclaved already mixed and so were added afterwards. These components were NaCO­3 and FeEDTA. Once added, the medium would contain all the necessary nutrients for the algae to survive.
 Next we tested the different concentrations of agar, there seemed to be little difference in how they set. When we pipetted the agar into the flasks, the agar was very reluctant to stick. We speculated that this was because the insides of the flasks were wet. Next time it would be important to ensure that the glass interior was dry. To get the agar to set/stick better, we inferred that the larger the temperature difference, the better. We acted on this by putting the flasks into an ice bucket to cool them down, both before and after the agar was dripped inside. Also, from our experimenting we think that the agar jelly would be most workable just on the point of setting, just before clumps begin to develop.




Getting specific patterns of agar was in fact quite difficult. The damp flask interior certainly didn’t help and getting the precise looking swirls we originally intended was proving to be impossible and quite fruitless. However, we found that shaking the sphere was the best way to get the agar to stick to the sides. It actually made an organic, mosaic-like pattern which we thought could actually be quite beautiful if the algae grew well on it. Deciding to go with what we had, we inoculated our two best flasks with the hardy, dark green Microcystis alga. This species is known to be good at growing in variable conditions and we thought this one would have the best chance of growing in our flasks.
We put the flasks into an incubator and we will photograph them as they develop over the next few weeks.





Tuesday, 26 March 2013

Day 1

The Introductory Day

For introductions, I'm Shirin, an undergraduate at Bristol University. I will be working with my partner in this project and fellow undergraduate, Jessica, to help produce a piece of artwork to go on show at the new life sciences building at the university. Our responsibilities include coming up with ideas and testing their plausibility to help the artist Tomas Saraceno, achieve his vision for his piece for our department. His ideas involve about 5 glass spheres suspended in a spider-like net. Our job is to consider what could go in each of these spheres and test the ideas. The first day of our work on the project initially involved a tour of the department and introductions to many members of staff whom we'd be working with over the next few weeks, as well  as getting to know each other.


 This is a photo of one of Tomas Saraceno's works- 'Lighter than Air'. This gave us some idea of what his vision would be for the life-science art piece.  http://www.tomassaraceno.com/

After our morning of settling in we started to prepare for a conversation with Tomas Saraceno and his assistant Adrien over Skype at 3pm. We allready had many questions and suggestions for the piece.

Questions and suggestions  included...
-How long would the piece be up for, or how often could it be replaced/maintained? This would be vital for the practicality of keeping living things.
-Would he be willing to grow fungi in the spheres as well as plants, this could make for some very interesting  colours.
-The idea of growing plants upside down.
-The issue of condensation collecting on the glass if it contained living things, obscuring the view from the outside.
-The issues of keeping the spheres sterile, a possible essential for some ideas.
-The possibility of having an aquatic sphere, how much weight can the spheres hold, and how will they be supported?

We both highly suggested that in many cases, inorganic structures simulating an illusion of life would be far more practicle. There would be very little to no maintance involved and there would be barely any limit on creativity. Using living organisms could be very limiting as many factors need to be met to keep them looking alive and attractive. We thought a very nice idea, especially for at least some of the spheres, would be to use organic materials such as iridescent beetle shells or feathers for example, to create sculptures such as those of animals or diatoms. We heard of a paint made from iridescent diatoms that sounded great for painting some of the possible sculptures. In many cases part of the net and spheres could show a macroscopic view of a microscopic world, such as with the diatoms, or parts of the net could represent neurons. Other ideas include having one of the spheres open with many climbing plants which could wrap around the cords supporting the sphere. We could grow algae within the spheres or within the tubes that support them.

Tomas was very keen on the idea of having experiments within the spheres. We thought this was perhaps best achieved by a single demonstration sphere, which could be easily interchangeable and perhaps represent work from many departments for a short period of time each. The project work of students could also be given some publicity in the sphere so that this artwork becomes very communal within the life-sciences department.

Ideally we want the spheres and net to represent all the departments, rather than representing more of one than another. We thought that running experiments for many different ideas and then allowing the staff to select 4 (as one of the 5 is taken up by the demonstration sphere), aswell as ideas for the appearance of the net that they thought would be the best, would be the most fair way of choosing the ideas for the final spheres.

We finished our day by sending out our first lot of emails to set up some meetings with members of the department to talk over some of our initial ideas ready to start experimenting for the next day.